JÄGER Busi­ness Blog

Why seals should nev­er be under­es­ti­mat­ed
in devel­op­ment — three typ­i­cal problems

17.11.2021   |   Tim Eltze 


Secure the Start of Production 

Find out which fac­tors influ­ence your SOP!

Seals are designed to pre­vent unde­sir­able mass trans­fer with­in tech­ni­cal prod­ucts. Because they are rel­a­tive­ly inex­pen­sive com­po­nents, they are not usu­al­ly giv­en high pri­or­i­ty in design. This is why seals often cause prob­lems in devel­op­ment projects, because each appli­ca­tion has its own require­ments for a seal­ing ele­ment, which design­ers must be aware of.

In this arti­cle, we take a look at three typ­i­cal prob­lems that can arise due to neg­li­gent han­dling of seals in the devel­op­ment of machines and devices. We will also tell you how you can effec­tive­ly avoid the dif­fi­cul­ties described.

Prob­lem 1: The instal­la­tion space is unsuit­able for the intend­ed seal

Whether (and for how long) a seal can per­form the task assigned to it depends not least on its instal­la­tion envi­ron­ment. Even for sim­ple O‑rings suit­able grooves or recess­es, for exam­ple, must be planned in the design into which the seal can be fit­ted. The require­ments for sophis­ti­cat­ed ele­ments such as rotary or hydraulic seals are more com­plex and call for spe­cif­ic design expertise.

If the intend­ed instal­la­tion space for a seal is insuf­fi­cient, this can cause prob­lems. Typ­i­cal­ly, exist­ing design draw­ings need to be adjust­ed late in the prod­uct devel­op­ment process (PEP), requir­ing addi­tion­al devel­op­ment loops. To avoid this, some com­pa­nies opt for high­ly com­plex seal­ing ele­ments that have yet to be designed for the project — includ­ing cost­ly tool­ing con­cepts. In the worst case, a seal is installed defec­tive­ly so that it fails soon­er or lat­er in use. At one man­u­fac­tur­er of elec­tron­ic devices, for exam­ple, an improp­er­ly installed seal caused the elec­tron­ics to come into con­tact with dust and fail com­plete­ly after a short time.

Man­u­fac­tur­ing com­pa­nies that want to avoid delays, con­se­quen­tial costs and loss of rep­u­ta­tion must already suf­fi­cient­ly con­sid­er the require­ments of each seal­ing com­po­nent (instal­la­tion space, func­tion­al require­ments, etc.) in their design draw­ings. How­ev­er, this does not mean that design­ers should design their machines around the seal. A sim­ple cat­a­log of mea­sures list­ing all rel­e­vant require­ments and process­es can often nip the dif­fi­cul­ties described above in the bud.

Prob­lem 2: The seal mate­r­i­al does not match the gen­er­al con­di­tions of the machine

Seals are also some­times sub­ject to strict legal require­ments and qual­i­ty stan­dards. Design teams must be aware of these require­ments at the begin­ning of the devel­op­ment project in order to be able to design a seal cor­rect­ly. Oth­er­wise, this also leads to expen­sive delays and addi­tion­al devel­op­ment loops.

One exam­ple of this is the UL94 fire clas­si­fi­ca­tion. This is used when a plas­tic arti­cle is exposed to a cer­tain fire risk and must there­fore be flame-resis­tant. In some cas­es, com­pa­nies for­get that this prop­er­ty must affect the entire prod­uct, not just indi­vid­ual com­po­nents. They may use a UL94-rat­ed plas­tic for the enclo­sure, but not for the seal. As a result, the over­all prod­uct is not suf­fi­cient­ly flame resis­tant, which can affect fur­ther certifications.

Such prob­lems are not uncom­mon in the devel­op­ment of seal­ing com­po­nents. They can be cir­cum­vent­ed with con­sci­en­tious mate­r­i­al selec­tion. In doing so, com­pa­nies must ana­lyze in advance all rel­e­vant frame­work con­di­tions that are of impor­tance for the seal. In addi­tion to legal require­ments, these include:

The deci­sive fac­tors in mate­r­i­al selec­tion are care, expe­ri­ence and exper­tise. Per se, there is a suit­able mate­r­i­al for every seal. The chal­lenge is to iden­ti­fy the mix­ture from the mul­ti­tude of mate­ri­als that best meets the require­ments of the seal.

Con­trol tech­ni­cian at an indus­tri­al plant

Prob­lem 3: The geom­e­try of the com­po­nent is not designed to suit the seal

As a rule, design teams focus on met­al com­po­nents first. Rub­ber and plas­tic parts do not get their atten­tion until the prod­uct is large­ly designed. How­ev­er, this means that seal­ing require­ments receive lit­tle atten­tion for a large part of the design process. This presents a chal­lenge for sup­pli­ers of rub­ber and plas­tic com­po­nents, who are asked to deliv­er seals that either can­not be man­u­fac­tured in the intend­ed form or can only be man­u­fac­tured at great finan­cial expense. Both sce­nar­ios have a neg­a­tive impact on dead­lines and cost tar­gets in the prod­uct devel­op­ment process.

The geo­met­ric design of the com­po­nent in which the seal is to be installed is a par­tic­u­lar source of dif­fi­cul­ty. Point­ed cor­ners and edges, com­pli­cat­ed angles and unusu­al shapes can only be sealed with great effort, if at all. The same applies to com­po­nents in which there are height dif­fer­ences. These make it dif­fi­cult to apply a seal even­ly because the mate­r­i­al mix­ture can­not be com­pressed even­ly dur­ing pro­duc­tion. Con­se­quent­ly, seal man­u­fac­tur­ers have to resort to com­plex, cost­ly man­u­fac­tur­ing process­es to meet their cus­tomers’ requirements.

If seals are con­sid­ered too late in the design process, this often pre­vents the use of cost-effec­tive solu­tions that are eas­i­er to imple­ment in terms of man­u­fac­tur­ing tech­nol­o­gy. Stan­dard seals (e.g. O‑rings), which could sim­ply be bought in with­out a ded­i­cat­ed mold con­cept, can­not be used in com­plex geome­tries, for exam­ple. Poten­tial sav­ings — not only mon­e­tary, but also in terms of the company’s car­bon foot­print (mate­r­i­al scrap, ener­gy use, etc.) — remain unused in this way.

It makes much more sense for design­ers to take into account the pre­req­ui­sites that must be met for a seal as ear­ly as the plan­ning stage. Their first approach should be to use stan­dard com­po­nents as often as pos­si­ble. If this is out of the ques­tion, design teams should seek con­tact with mate­r­i­al experts at an ear­ly stage. Their know-how makes it eas­i­er to devel­op the best solu­tion with a view to mon­e­tary spec­i­fi­ca­tions and man­u­fac­tur­ing imple­men­ta­tion options.


Even minor neg­li­gence in seal­ing tech­nol­o­gy can result in dam­age claims, com­plex devel­op­ment loops and addi­tion­al costs. This makes it all the more impor­tant for design teams to take a detailed look at the gen­er­al con­di­tions to which their seals will be exposed right at the start of the project. This con­cerns, among oth­er things, the nec­es­sary instal­la­tion space, the mate­r­i­al to be used, and the geom­e­try of the com­po­nents in which the seals are to be installed.

Secure the Start of Production 

Learn which fac­tors influ­ence your SOP! 

Author: Tim Eltze

Tim Eltze has been work­ing in the field of rub­ber and plas­tic prod­ucts for more than 20 years and has in-depth exper­tise in these areas. He is cur­rent­ly employed by Jäger as Region­al Man­ag­er North and Site Man­ag­er Hamburg. 

Share this post!

Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on telegram
Share on whatsapp
Share on xing
Share on email
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on xing
Share on email

Covid-19 Contents